

I can understand why
John Squire won't make anymore music, and why he refuses to reunite with the Stone Roses. Yes, he was one of the most influential guitarists of his era, and left an indelible mark on the course of British pop. But after the band broke up, and he had little success of his own in solo efforts and side projects (The Seahorses, The Shining, etc.), I guess he saw the writing on the wall. No one wants to hear you beat a dead horse, and in a recent interview on his website he says quite plainly, "music is a young man's game." Hmm, don't tell Mick Jagger that.
It's kind of sad, though. The fact is, musicians don't make music in a

vacuum. Well, maybe some of them do, but the very best shine brightest when collaborating with others. I guess at this point, it's kind of pointless to wish Squire would reunite with the Roses, but I think there are still years left for him. I really think he could put out solo compositions that might be excellent, even without lyrics. I may be alone in that sentiment, but I doubt it.
Anyway, his modern art is just not doing it for me. The Jackson Pollock pieces were pretty cool in the era the Roses were playing, but
his current stuff is doing nothing for his rep. Yawn.
Well, until he decides to pick up that axe of his again, Roses obsessed freaks such as myself will just have to satisfy ourselves pouring over his past work. My favorite recent find is
The Squire Files, a very comprehensive exploration of the guitarists effects set up and techniques. If only this existed 15 years ago!